Managing environmental performance

Since 2002, Veolia Environnement's Environmental Management System (EMS) has been used to openly and accurately gauge progress on public health and environmental issues. Thanks to this unique management tool, all divisions can measure the impact of our activities and the compliance regarding internal rules and external regulations.

Key indicators

As part of its 2009-2011 campaign, the company set quantified targets and commitments on trends for ten key indicators covering major environmental issues.

INDICATOR ACHIEVED ON 
DEC 31, 2011
2011 TARGET VALUE TREND

Environmental Management System (EMS) implementation

85%

85%

YES

Environmental progress by priority facilities in the past five years

92%

> 95%

NO

Percentage of renewable and alternative energy in total energy consumption

 28%

> 25%

YES

Carbon efficiency ratio of Veolia Energy-Dalkia (overall reduction in GHG emissions/total GHG emissions) (1)

27.3%

> 24%

YES

Volume of water lost in water networks (2008 base geographic scope)

1,545 million m3

< 1,615 million m3

YES

Percentage of the population evaluated with water quality classes

96.1%

100%

NO

Overall wastewater treatment efficiency for plants with a capacity of over 50,000 population equivalent

 83.4%

> 80%

YES

Percentage of treated waste disposed of without any energy or materials recovery

51.5%

< 51.5%

YES

Percentage of waste treated in incinerators with dioxin emissions lower than 0.1 ng/Nm3 (all sites)

98.2%

> 95%

YES

Unit emissions of CO, HC and particle matter (PM) by passenger transportation vehicles (base scope 2008)(2)

CO:
2.46 g/km
HC:
0.45 g/km
Particles:
0.19 g/km

CO:
< 2.36 g/km
HC:
< 0.48 g/km
Particles:
< 0.20 g/km

NO

YES

YES

(1) For more information about the definition of the indicator, refer to p.18.

(2) The 2011 values are pro forma compared with a 2008 geographic base scope representing 84% of the fleet of heavy road vehicles (excluding electric vehicles).

To top

Environmental performance

In 2011, the percentage implementation of the Environmental Management System (internal EMS and ISO 14001 certifications) increased by 4 percentage points to 85% as a result of improvements in each of the four divisions.

An environmental evaluation was made of 92% of the total 1,517 priority facilities over the past five years (representing an increase of 7 points regarding 2010). This reflects a plain increased audit effort by all divisions in 2011 (+21%).

This evaluation is, within the context of the EMS, an assessment of the regulatory compliance with the applicable environmental texts.

To top

Fighting against climate change

In 2011, direct and indirect emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) decreased 5% at the corporate level to 45 million metric tons of CO2 eq. This is due to the sharp 8% reduction in direct emissions that account for more than 85% of Veolia Environnement's emissions.

Total Direct and indirect GHG emissions (million metric tons CO2 eq.)



In addition, the company contributes to an overall reduction of GHG emissions by reducing emissions from facilities managed or allowing third parties to avoid emissions.

In 2011, the overall GHG emission reduction indicator fell by 3.7% at the corporate level to 26.5 million metric tons CO2 eq. This corresponds to reductions in direct and indirect emissions (CO2 not emitted as a result of certain operating methods implemented by the company), and the emissions third parties avoid as a result of a company activity.

Distribution of the overall reduction in GHG emissions in 2011

To top

Capture and treat methane

In 2011, fugitive methane emissions accounted for nearly 24% of Veolia Environnement's direct GHG emissions. Given this significant percentage, Veolia Environnement is motivated to continually improve:

  • the precision of its calculation methodologies;
  • knowledge of the typology of landfilled waste;
  • the performance of landfill cell capping techniques, biogas collection and its conversion into heat, electricity or fuel.

These factors combined have led to a significant 7% drop in methane emissions, and so to a two-point improvement in the collection rate to 56% in 2011.

To top

Management of our own impacts

As part of the campaign to protect ecosystems and biodiversity, Veolia Environnement is committed to accurately defining its impact and dependency on ecosystems, acting to preserve biodiversity, and making wise use of "ecosystem services" while informing, training and educating people on these issues.

In 2011, material recovery fell by 6% due to the sale of business in Norway. However, at a constant scope, material recovery actually increased by 2.4 points. On the other hand, energy recovery at landfills and incinerators rose 1.5 and 0.8 points respectively. Consequently, the percentage of treated waste disposed of (2) without energy or material recovery fell in 2011 to 51.5%, which is compliant with the target.

Percentage of waste per treatment process (with energy or materials recovery)

To top

Conserving energy resources

Veolia Environnement is committed to improving energy efficiency, not just in the facilities it operates, but also through the energy services it provides. Wherever possible, it also promotes the use of renewable and alternative energy, in accordance with the targets it has set, and makes every effort to recover the maximum energy potential from waste, wastewater to be treated or from the facilities it operates.

Renewable and alternative energy as a percentage of the total energy consumed

To top

Saving water resources

In many cities around the world, 20% to 50% of the water produced is lost because of distribution network leaks. Veolia Water has made leak reduction one of its main priorities.

The presentation of the 2009 to 2011 results on the basis of the active contracts in 2008 provides an appreciation of the efforts made. For example, the overall network yield has been maintained at 77%, the linear index at a little over 13 m3/km/d and the loss target set at 1,615,000 m3 has been met (5% reduction in the volume of losses compared with the 2008 reporting scope).

To top